Skip to main content

N30 Global

N30 Global · Wealth & asset architecture · 2026

Wealth structuring and asset separation: do not place everything you built inside the same risk perimeter.

The company that creates wealth also carries risk. When cash, real estate, investments, IP and family wealth sit in the same perimeter as customers, debt and contracts, one business problem can reach more than it needs to.

RISKwhat can reach what
OWNERSHIPwho should own the asset
FLOWShow capital moves
EXITsale, reinvestment, succession
01Strategic answer

Asset separation does not mean hiding assets. It means putting each asset in the perimeter that fits its purpose.

A wealth architecture can combine a holding company, operating companies, property/investment vehicles and, where justified, succession layers. The goal is not more entities — it is preventing assets with different purposes from carrying the same unnecessary risks.

02Symptoms

Assets you no longer need to risk may still be sitting inside the risk.

01 · CASH

Operating company holds years of accumulated profits.

Reinvestment capital stays exposed to trading risk.

02 · PROPERTY

Property sits in the company that trades.

A stable asset shares the same perimeter as commercial claims.

03 · PORTFOLIO

Stocks/ETFs/private investments are bought in the operating company.

Investment and trading functions become mixed.

04 · IP

Brand/software sits in the highest-risk company.

A strategic asset shares operating liabilities.

05 · GUARANTEES

Debt uses personal or cross-company guarantees.

Finance reconnects balance sheets that appeared separate.

06 · EXIT

You do not know what should remain outside a future sale.

Buyer, property, cash and investments can be trapped in one perimeter.

03Map

Ask every asset: why are you here?

OWNER / FAMILYwealth & succession
HOLDING / OWNERSHIPcapital allocation
OPERATIONScommercial risk
PROPERTYasset / finance
INVESTMENTSportfolio
IPonly if justified
04Assets

Different assets deserve different risk logic.

01

OPERATIONS

Customers, people, inventory and contracts belong with the actual trade.

02

TREASURY

Working capital differs from excess capital intended for long-term reinvestment.

03

REAL ESTATE

Risk, financing, ownership and future sale may justify a separate vehicle.

04

INVESTMENTS

Financial portfolios may need a different perimeter from the productive business.

05

IP / INTANGIBLES

Separate only where functions, valuation, licensing and substance support it.

06

FAMILY WEALTH

Preservation, family use and succession have different objectives from business risk.

05Prevention
Reactive

Move assets only after creditors or disputes appear.

Assume a limited company makes assets untouchable.

Strip the trading company while liabilities remain.

Use related-party rents/loans without arm's-length terms.

Move IP without real functions or valuation.

Create SPVs later reconnected by cross-guarantees.

Preventive

Separate proactively by function/risk.

Keep adequate operating capital.

Document related parties at market value.

Design debt/guarantees with the structure.

Plan income, reinvestment and exit by asset.

Coordinate wealth with residence/succession.

06Spain

In Spain, a “patrimonial entity” is a tax classification, not a legal form.

Spanish CIT Article 5 treats an entity as patrimonial where more than half its assets consist of securities or non-business assets under the statutory rules.

Tax classification, not company type.

Real-estate leasing generally needs at least one full-time employee to qualify as economic activity under the statute, with group rules where applicable.

Holding and patrimonial entity are different concepts.

Actual asset/activity mix controls the result.

Status can affect certain tax regimes/incentives.

The company name tells you nothing by itself.

07Real limits

Asset separation, yes. Retroactive shielding, no.

Limited liability generally separates company debt from shareholders, but assets inside the company remain exposed to its creditors. Spanish insolvency and civil law also provide remedies against certain prejudicial or creditor-fraud transactions.

Company assets answer for company liabilities.

Personal/cross guarantees reconnect risk.

Design separation before the problem.

Insolvency law can unwind prejudicial transactions even without fraudulent intent in defined cases.

Civil law also addresses creditor-fraud transactions.

Directors may have separate liabilities in specific situations.

The goal is not to make assets unreachable. It is to avoid unnecessary exposure.

08Related parties

Between group companies, pricing is part of the architecture.

Spanish CIT Article 18 requires related-party transactions to be valued at market value. Rent, loans, management fees, IP licences and asset transfers cannot be priced merely to move profit.

Operating ↔ property rent: market terms.

Loans: rate, term, creditworthiness, evidence.

Management fees: real service and benefit.

IP: functions, valuation and substance.

Asset transfers: valuation + indirect tax.

Dividends and services are not interchangeable.

09Transparency

An international wealth structure is not an invisible structure.

Beneficial-ownership and AML rules identify the natural persons ultimately controlling companies, foundations and, where applicable, trusts or analogous arrangements. Premium planning must survive banking, registries, KYC and tax review.

UBO identification where required.

Companies/foundations can have ownership reporting.

Trusts can generate specific reporting.

Banks require source of wealth/funds.

More layers mean more compliance, not anonymity.

Complexity must create real economic value.

10Use cases

Start with the asset. Then choose the vehicle.

SituationStructurePotential valueReview
Accumulated cashHolding + treasury policySeparate working capital from reinvestment capitalDistributions, reserves, finance
Property in tradeProperty SPV / restructuringSeparate stable asset from trading riskTransfer taxes, finance, creditors
Portfolio in operationHolding / investment vehicleFunctional separationPatrimonial status, related parties, owner tax
IP in risk companyIP vehicle only with substanceSeparate strategic assetValuation, DEMPE, WHT, TP
Multiple owners/familiesSeparate vehicles + holdingAlign ownership by assetAgreements, valuation, finance
Cross-border wealthHolding/SPVs + succession layerOrganise by jurisdiction/objectiveResidence, CFC, UBO, estate tax
11N30 method

We map the whole balance sheet before moving one asset.

01 · INVENTORY

Companies, property, cash, investments, IP, debt and guarantees.

02 · RISK

Which liability can reach each asset.

03 · SCENARIOS

Keep vs holding, SPV or separate vehicle.

04 · TAX MODEL

Transfer, income, related parties, dividends, sale and succession.

05 · ROADMAP

What to move, what not to move and in what order.

12FAQ

Questions before moving an asset.

What is wealth structuring?

An ownership architecture organising assets, risks, flows and succession, using companies/holdings/SPVs only where each has a real function.

Is this the same as a Spanish patrimonial company?

No. In Spain, patrimonial entity is a tax classification under Article 5; wealth structuring is a planning concept.

Should property be separated from trading operations?

Often worth analysing, but transfers can trigger tax, finance and creditor effects. It should not be automatic.

Should all cash leave the operating company?

No. The business needs adequate working capital and reserves. The analysis distinguishes operating capital from excess capital.

Can I create a company to invest treasury?

Potentially, but tax, patrimonial classification, related parties, banking and future owner tax must be compared.

Does a limited company fully protect assets?

No. Assets inside the company remain exposed to that company's creditors and guarantees/liabilities can reconnect risks.

Can assets be moved once trouble starts?

That is when creditor and insolvency rules become most sensitive. Asset structuring should be preventive.

How should group companies charge each other?

Related-party transactions should reflect real operations and arm's-length value, with documentation where required.

Does a trust/foundation protect wealth better?

It may serve control/succession functions but is not a universal shield. Residence, beneficiaries, UBO, creditor law and tax come first.

When should I review the structure?

When meaningful capital accumulates, assets are acquired, debt grows, businesses diversify, an exit approaches or succession begins.

Next step

The wealth that took the longest to build should not remain exposed by inertia.

We review every asset, the risk it carries, who owns it and what happens on reinvestment, sale or transfer. If separation adds value, we design the architecture before anything moves.